To avoid an insurer checking the validity or adequacy of the sum insured every time they take on a new property insurance risk, the insurance company will limit their own liability by applying a condition to the policy known as:

Enhance your understanding of financial advising with the Qualified Financial Adviser (QFA) Loans Exam 1 Test. Prepare with detailed questions, hints, and explanations to ace your exam!

Multiple Choice

To avoid an insurer checking the validity or adequacy of the sum insured every time they take on a new property insurance risk, the insurance company will limit their own liability by applying a condition to the policy known as:

Explanation:
The main idea is a proportional settlement rule known as an average clause. It automatically limits the insurer’s liability if the sum insured is less than the property's actual value, by paying only a proportion of the loss based on the ratio of sum insured to actual value. For example, if the property’s real value is 200,000 but it’s insured for only 120,000, and a loss of 80,000 occurs, the insurer would pay (120,000 / 200,000) × 80,000 = 48,000. The insured covers the remaining 32,000. This mechanism discourages under-insurance and means the insurer doesn’t have to re-verify the adequacy of the sum insured for every claim. Other terms serve different purposes (for instance, reinstatement focuses on restoring coverage after a loss, not on adjusting the payout for under-insurance), so the clause that directly ties payout to the actual value versus the sum insured is the one that limits liability automatically in the way described.

The main idea is a proportional settlement rule known as an average clause. It automatically limits the insurer’s liability if the sum insured is less than the property's actual value, by paying only a proportion of the loss based on the ratio of sum insured to actual value.

For example, if the property’s real value is 200,000 but it’s insured for only 120,000, and a loss of 80,000 occurs, the insurer would pay (120,000 / 200,000) × 80,000 = 48,000. The insured covers the remaining 32,000. This mechanism discourages under-insurance and means the insurer doesn’t have to re-verify the adequacy of the sum insured for every claim.

Other terms serve different purposes (for instance, reinstatement focuses on restoring coverage after a loss, not on adjusting the payout for under-insurance), so the clause that directly ties payout to the actual value versus the sum insured is the one that limits liability automatically in the way described.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy